KOREAN ASSOCIATION FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW
Association Inquiries
KAAILKorean Association for Artificial Intelligence and LawArtificial Intelligence · Law · Policy

KAAIL · AI LAW & POLICY RESEARCH

Behind AI Policy: A Critical Review of Underlying Conceptions of Assessment in Higher Education

AI Summary Based on the Abstract: This abstract summarizes a comparative analysis of how university policies related to generative AI (GenAI) conceptualize assessment. Based on policy documents from 14 universities in Switzerland and Spain, it reports the coexistence of concerns about academic integrity, authorship, transparency, and data protection with demands for AI literacy, assessment redesign, formative feedback, and critical use

International ResearchCrossrefAI summary
Author

Mònica Feixas · Georgeta Ion · Liana Pirovino · Mireia Barrobés

Publication DateLanguage und

AI Research Summary

Before Human Review

Abstract-based · Full paper not reviewed · Not an official association position

Summary createdBrief updated

This abstract summarizes a comparative analysis of how university policies related to generative AI (GenAI) conceptualize assessment. Based on policy documents from 14 universities in Switzerland and Spain, it reports the coexistence of concerns about academic integrity, authorship, transparency, and data protection with demands for AI literacy, assessment redesign, formative feedback, and critical use. It also argues that an asymmetry emerges in which teachers and institutions primarily define legitimate use, while students are assigned responsibility for disclosure, justification, and verification. This summary is based on the abstract; the full text was not reviewed.

Key Points from the Abstract

  1. Assessment is presented as a core point of conflict in GenAI policy.
  2. Policies include both AI-resistant and integrative approaches.
  3. Responsibility is concentrated on students, while teachers’ needs receive relatively less attention.

Relevance to AI Law and Policy

Useful for discussions of AI policy in higher education, assessment design, allocation of student responsibility, and participatory governance.

Limitations to Consider

  • The abstract alone makes it difficult to assess the adequacy of the detailed methods and evidence.
  • The limitation identified by the authors is the incompleteness of the policy documents; no additional limitations are specified in the abstract.
  • Because the full text was not reviewed, the scope of interpretation is limited.

Please compare with the original text before citing or using it in your assessment.

Abstract Preview
Abstract The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has prompted universities to develop policies regul…
Read more in the abstract and original text

Research Topic

AI Law and Policy

Original text and source

Original Title

Behind the AI policies: A critical examination of the underlying conceptions of assessment in higher education

The Korean title on this page was translated by AI.
Journal or publication
Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation
Original publisher
Akademiai Kiado Zrt.
Database
Crossref
Original paperRead more in the original text
Research Trend List