KOREAN ASSOCIATION FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW
Association Inquiries
KAAILKorean Association for Artificial Intelligence and LawArtificial Intelligence · Law · Policy

KAAIL · AI LAW & POLICY RESEARCH

인공지능 기술을 활용하여 생성된 객체에 대한 지식재산권 분쟁에서의 사법 실무의 발전: 법 집행에 관한 분석

AI summary based on the abstract: This is a summary based only on the abstract; the full text was not reviewed. The article analyzes case law from the Arbitration Courts of the Russian Federation and argues that, in disputes over the protection of intellectual property results (RID) created by generative neural networks, the courts generally view AI as a human tool and apply Part 4 of the existing Russian Civil Code without major modification. It also states that

International ResearchCrossrefAI summary
Author

Natalya A. Shtyrkhunova

Publication DateLanguage und

AI Research Summary

Before Human Review

Based on abstract · Full text not reviewed

This is a summary based only on the abstract; the full text was not reviewed. The article analyzes case law from the Arbitration Courts of the Russian Federation and argues that, in disputes over the protection of intellectual property results (RID) created by generative neural networks, the courts generally view AI as a human tool and apply Part 4 of the existing Russian Civil Code without major modification. It also states that evidence proving the user’s creative involvement is central to establishing authorship, and that issues arise regarding recognition of multiple infringements involving repeated images and the calculation of damages.

Key Points from the Abstract

  1. It describes the courts as taking a conservative stance, mainly treating AI as a tool and applying existing norms.
  2. It argues that creative control and evidentiary materials (prompts, source data, revision history) are key.
  3. It points out that the number of infringements and damage calculations in the repeated generation of the same image are issues.

Relevance to AI Law and Policy

It examines copyright, the burden of proof, and damages issues involving AI-generated outputs in the context of Russian case law, and is useful as a reference for comparative law and policy design.

Limitations to Consider

  • This is an abstract-based summary, so the full text was not reviewed.
  • The detailed design of the research method cannot be sufficiently confirmed from the abstract.
  • The general validity of the issues raised cannot be determined from the abstract alone.

Please compare with the original text before citing or using it in your assessment.

Abstract Preview
The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the emerging judicial practice of arbitration courts of…
Read more in the abstract and original text

Research Topic

AI Law and Policy

Original text and source

Original Title

Evolution of Judicial Practice in Disputes over Intellectual Rights to Objects Created Using Artificial Intelligence Technologies: An Analysis of Law Enforcement

The Korean title on this page was translated by AI.
Database
Crossref
Original paperRead more in the original text
Research Trend List