AI Research Summary
Before Human ReviewBased on abstract · Full text not reviewed
Abstract-based summary and the full original text was not reviewed. This article examines, through dogmatic legal interpretation, whether existing human rights law imposes enforceable duties of accountability and transparency on states and companies in relation to the human rights impacts caused by AI decision-making. With reference to the UNGP, ICCPR, EU AI Act, UNESCO Recommendation, India’s constitutional order, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act of 2023, it proposes a governance gap and a human-rights-friendly design model.
Key Points from the Abstract
- The lack of enforceable audit and accountability mechanisms is presented as the core gap.
- The difficulty of remedies for rights violations and of assigning responsibility along the AI supply chain is pointed out.
- A human-rights-by-design governance model is proposed.
Relevance to AI Law and Policy
It offers direct reference points for reviewing accountability, transparency, human rights, and regulatory design in AI decision-making. It is useful for comparative legal and policy analysis.
Limitations to Consider
- This can be confirmed only from the abstract, and the details of the arguments and evidence are unclear.
- It is not confirmed from the abstract whether this is an empirical study.
- No separate limitations are explicitly stated.
Please compare with the original text before citing or using it in your assessment.
Abstract Preview
The proliferation of artificial intelligence across public and private sectors has positioned algorithmic decision-makin…Read more in the abstract and original text Research Topic
Original text and source
Accountability and Transparency in AI Systems: A Human Rights Perspective
The Korean title on this page was translated by AI.- Database
- Crossref